Compliance
The VAT answer with its source and its date.
- Doctrine in force
- Text cited, date shown
- Human review required
It reads the doctrine, the texts and your internal notes. It returns a sourced, dated answer. It does not commit you without review.
Three forums, two articles, no date.
The question is precise. The answers you find are not: a blog post with no date, a forum thread from 2019, an internal note nobody knows has been updated. You decide on instinct and note it down to check later.
In compliance, an answer without a source is not an answer. It is a risk.
3 guardrails, not 3 promises.
Each one proves itself in use, not in a brochure.
Every answer carries its reference
The text cited, its version date, and the exact passage the answer rests on. Nothing that cannot be traced to a document.
It stops where the doctrine is silent
If the case is not covered, it says so and shows what comes closest. It does not fill a gap with a deduction presented as a rule.
Human review is mandatory
The answer is a documented starting point, not an opinion. A human reviews it and owns it before it is used to decide.
The question asked in the morning, documented before noon.
You put the case in your own words. The assistant finds the applicable texts, cites the passage, shows the version date and brings in your internal notes where they exist. What remains uncertain is marked uncertain, with what would need checking.
The rest, once trust is settled.
What never leaves your walls.
If your AI provider cannot put these four lines in writing, ask them why.
Watch it work on your document.
Twenty minutes, on your own data. Bring what this assistant will have to read, and you watch live what it does with it, and where it stops.