Tenders
The technical bid you have already written twenty times.
- Reads the whole tender pack
- Reuses your past answers
- Lists the missing documents
It reads the tender pack, your past technical bids, your references and your certificates. It returns the criteria analysis, the first draft of the bid and the list of documents. It does not decide whether to bid.
You already have the answer. It is in a folder from 2023.
The same question about your quality approach comes back with every consultation. It has been written, reviewed, approved. Nobody remembers which folder it is in. So it gets rewritten, less well, the night before submission.
Your raw material exists. It simply cannot be read through in one night.
3 guardrails, not 3 promises.
Each one proves itself in use, not in a brochure.
It reads the whole pack
Rules of consultation, specifications, answer template, annexes. It extracts the award criteria, their weighting, the deadlines and the exact list of documents required.
It cites your answers, not its own
Every paragraph of the draft points back to the bid it came from. What you have never written, it leaves blank and flags, rather than filling the gap.
It does not decide for you
It says what the pack requires and what you are missing. Whether to bid is a commercial call, and it does not make it.
The pack in the morning, the first draft in the afternoon.
You drop in the consultation pack. The assistant pulls out the criteria grid, finds in your past bids the paragraphs that already answer, and assembles a first draft in the required template. Alongside, the list of documents: the ones you have, the ones to request.
The rest, once trust is settled.
What never leaves your walls.
If your AI provider cannot put these four lines in writing, ask them why.
Watch it work on your document.
Twenty minutes, on your own data. Bring what this assistant will have to read, and you watch live what it does with it, and where it stops.